Threat ≠ prevention, challenge ≠ promotion: The impact of threat, challenge and regulatory focus on attention to negative stimuli

, &
Cognition and Emotion 29 (1):188-195 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/02699931.2014.898612

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Attracted to power: challenge/threat and promotion/prevention focus differentially predict the attractiveness of group power.Annika Scholl, Claudia Sassenrath & Kai Sassenberg - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Broad attention does not buffer the impact of emotionally salient stimuli on performance.Stephanie C. Goodhew & Mark Edwards - forthcoming - Cognition and Emotion.
Brief report interpretation of death‐relevant ambiguous stimuli as a function of death threat.Todd Shackelford & Gina Agostinelli - 2003 - Cognition and Emotion 17 (6):943-950.
The unexpected killer: effects of stimulus threat and negative affectivity on inattentional blindness.Vanessa Beanland, Choo Hong Tan & Bruce K. Christensen - 2017 - Cognition and Emotion 32 (6):1374-1381.
Author Reply: Arousal Reappraisal as an Affect Regulation Strategy.Jeremy P. Jamieson, Emily J. Hangen, Hae Yeon Lee & David S. Yeager - 2018 - Emotion Review 10 (1):74-76.
Egoism or Altruism? The Influence of Cause-Related Marketing on Customers’ Extra-Role Behavior.Zhang Hui & Hu Wenan - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13:799336.
Threat captures attention but does not affect learning of contextual regularities.Motonori Yamaguchi & Sarah L. Harwood - 2017 - Cognition and Emotion 31 (3).
Selective attention to threat: A test of two cognitive models of anxiety.Karin Mogg, James McNamara, Mark Powys, Hannah Rawlinson, Anna Seiffer & Brendan P. Bradley - 2000 - Cognition and Emotion 14 (3):375-399.
The self regulatory effect of attentional control in modulating the relationship between attentional biases toward threat and anxiety symptoms in children.Georgiana Susa, Irina Pitică, Oana Benga & Mircea Miclea - 2012 - Cognition and Emotion 26 (6):1069-1083.
Watch out! Directional threat-related postures cue attention and the eyes.Bobby Azarian, Elizabeth G. Esser & Matthew S. Peterson - 2016 - Cognition and Emotion 30 (3):561-569.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-25

Downloads
14 (#1,019,789)

6 months
5 (#710,385)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references