Patient Confidentiality: Hospital’s Release of Alcohol Treatment Data Does Not Violate Regs

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (2):319-321 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In M.A.K. v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, the Illinois Supreme Court reversed the appellate court and held that the phrase any physician, medical practitioner, hospital, clinic, health care facility or other medical or medically related facility, in a patient's signed consent form met the general designation requirement of the Code of Federal Regulations for the release of alcohol and drug abuse treatment records. Thus, the Illinois Supreme Court held that the medical center's release of a patient's records did not violate the federal Confidentiality of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Patient Records regulations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Illinois Court Holds Physicians Liable Under Learned Intermediary Doctrine.T. B. E. - 1996 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 24 (1):73-74.
Ethics and law in modern medicine: hypothetical case studies.David M. Vukadinovich - 2001 - Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Edited by Susan L. Krinsky.
Hospital Consent for Disclosure of Medical Records.Jon F. Merz, Pamela Sankar & Simon S. Yoo - 1998 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 26 (3):241-248.
Hospital Consent for Disclosure of Medical Records.Jon F. Merz, Pamela Sankar & Simon S. Yoo - 1998 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 26 (3):241-248.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-06

Downloads
8 (#1,336,469)

6 months
6 (#700,858)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references