A decade after the ‘‘Sokal Hoax,’’ Alan Sokal and Paul Boghossian still claim that postmodern arguments are incoherent attacks on reason and truth. However, both also continue to mischaracterize ‘‘constructivist’’ epistemology, to engage in highly problematic logical gymnastics to defend their own views, and to ignore changes in philosophy of science and science studies since 1996. I offer a brief description of my own, rather different understanding of postmodern science criticism in order to contextualize my dissatisfaction with Sokal and Boghossian’s arguments, and to highlight the value of cross-subfield anthropological collaboration based on the constructivist perspective articulated by Barbara Herrnstein Smith. Downloaded by [New York University] at 03:33 19 July 2011..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Scandalous Knowledge: Science, Truth and the Human.Barbara Herrnstein Smith - 2006 - Duke University Press.
Coherence, Truth, and the Development of Scientific Knowledge.Paul Thagard - 2007 - Philosophy of Science 74 (1):28-47.
Scandalous Knowledge: Science, Truth, and the Humanby Barbara Herrnstein Smith.Catherine Hundleby - 2008 - Hypatia 23 (4):233-237.
Fear of Knowledge, Against Relativism and Constructivism – by Paul Artin Boghossian.H. G. Callaway - 2009 - Dialectica 63 (3):357-360.
Hitting the Straw Man, Missing the Parade. Review of “Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism” by Paul Boghossian.S. Deterding - 2011 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (2):278-281.
Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism.Paul Artin Boghossian - 2006 - Oxford University Press.
Added to index2011-07-20
Total downloads37 ( #140,843 of 2,177,967 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,205 of 2,177,967 )
How can I increase my downloads?