Iconic Syntax: sign language classifier predicates and gesture sequences

Linguistics and Philosophy 47 (1):77-147 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We argue that the pictorial nature of certain constructions in signs and in gestures explains surprising properties of their syntax. In several sign languages, the standard word order (e.g. SVO) gets turned into SOV (with preverbal arguments) when the predicate is a classifier, a distinguished construction with highly iconic properties (e.g. Pavlič, 2016). In silent gestures, participants also prefer an SOV order in extensional constructions, irrespective of the word order of the language they speak (Goldin-Meadow et al., 2008). But in silent gestures and in Brazilian Sign Language (Libras), intensional constructions can override these SOV preferences, yielding SVO instead (Schouwstra & de Swart, 2014; Napoli et al., 2017). This distinction was argued to be due to iconicity: arguments are expressed before the verb if they correspond to entities that are present before the action, otherwise they follow the verb. While agreeing with this intuition, we propose that the extensional/intensional distinction is neither empirically nor theoretically appropriate. In new data from American Sign Language, we replicate the distinction among extensional classifier predicates: for _x ate up the ball_, the ball is typically seen before the eating and a preposed object is preferred; but for _x spit out the ball_, the ball is typically seen after the spitting and a postposed object is preferred, although both _eat up_ and _spit out_ are used extensionally. We extend this finding to data involving pro-speech (= speech-replacing) gestures embedded in French sentences. We argue for a Visibility Generalization according to which arguments appear before the verb if their denotations are typically visible before the action, and we develop a new formal account within a pictorial semantics for visual animations (inspired by Greenberg and Abusch). It derives the observed word order preferences, it explains how the semantics of classifier predicates combines iconic and conventional properties, and it makes a more general point: sign language semantics combines logical semantics with pictorial semantics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Quotation, demonstration, and iconicity.Kathryn Davidson - 2015 - Linguistics and Philosophy 38 (6):477-520.
Language as Gesture: Merleau-Ponty and American Sign Language.Jerry H. Gill - 2010 - International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (1):25-37.
Language as Gesture: Merleau-Ponty and American Sign Language.Jerry H. Gill - 2010 - International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (1):25-37.
Iconic variables.Philippe Schlenker, Jonathan Lamberton & Mirko Santoro - 2013 - Linguistics and Philosophy 36 (2):91-149.
Vague predicates and language games.Rohit Parikh - 1996 - Theoria 11 (3):97-107.
Vague Predicates and Language Games.Rohit Parikh - 1996 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 11 (3):97-107.
Iconic features.Philippe Schlenker - 2014 - Natural Language Semantics 22 (4):299-356.
Negating gradable adjectives.Chris Collins - 2023 - Natural Language Semantics 31 (2):121-137.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-08

Downloads
16 (#898,367)

6 months
12 (#207,528)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references