False Enemies: Malebranche, Leibniz, and the Best of All Possible Worlds

In Daniel Garber & Steven Nadler (eds.), Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy Vol I, 2003. Oup Oxford. pp. 165-182 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Leibniz's controversial target in the best-of-all-possible-worlds theory is not Malebranche, as is commonly claimed, but Suarez

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

False Enemies: Malebranche, Leibniz, and the Best of All Possible Worlds.Emanuela Scribano - 2003 - In Daniel Garber & Steven M. Nadler (eds.), Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy Volume 1. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 165-182.
The Actual World.Donald Rutherford - 2013 - In Maria Rosa Antognazza (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Leibniz. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 65-85.
Leibniz, Acosmism, and Incompossibility.Thomas Feeney - 2016 - In Brown Gregory & Yual Chiek (eds.), Leibniz on Compossibility and Possible Worlds. Cham: Springer. pp. 145-174.
False Optimism? Leibniz, Evil, and the Best of all Possible Worlds.Lloyd Strickland - 2010 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 15 (1):17-35.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-21

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Book Reviews. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2005 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (1):163-200.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references