ProtoSociology 36:101-139 (2019)

Abstract
Kant distinguishes two kinds of knowledge of one-self: empirical self-knowledge due to inner sense and a priori self-knowledge achieved by transcendental apperception. This conception encounters a host of problems. I try to solve these problems from the perspective of today’s phenomenology and analytical philosophy. I first introduce a new conception of inner sense and time-consciousness and argue that empirical self-knowledge must be based on the category of person, a category Kant did not list in his table of categories. I explain how the schematism of this category works. Then I introduce the a priori notion of the subject which corresponds to Kant’s ‘I think’. However, unlike Kant I hold that the notion of the subject is the notion of a being which has certain a priori capacities. Kant did not see that the term ‘I’ must be conceived of as an indexical. I argue that this indexical refers to both, the subject who does the thinking and the person who is thought. On this basis I give an answer to the question how genuine de-se knowledge is possible. I further defend—against Wittgenstein and others—the use of a private thought language. Finally, I show that what I have developed is—notwithstanding the refutation of important elements of Kant’s theory—still essentially a Kantian approach.
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  Social Science
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/protosociology2019364
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,916
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Are Kant’s Concepts and Methodology Inconsistent with Scientific Change? Constitutivity and the Synthetic Method in Kant.Paul L. Franco - 2012 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 2 (2):321-353.
Kant's Theory of Self-Knowledge.Quanhua Liu - 1994 - Dissertation, Duke University
Apriority in Kant and Merleau-Ponty.M. C. Dillon - 1987 - Kant-Studien 78 (1-4):403-423.
The Ontology of Kant’s Theory of Knowledge.Robert Greenberg - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:39-48.
Kant’s Categories Reconsidered.Robert Greenberg - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 11:58-64.
A Priori Knowledge.Graciela De Pierris - 1983 - Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Kant’s Theory of A Priori Knowledge.Robert Greenberg - 2001 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
On the Psychogenesis of the a Priori: Jean Piaget's Critique of Kant.Horst Pfeiffle - 2008 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (5):487-498.
The Emergence of German Idealism. [REVIEW]Damon Linker - 2000 - Review of Metaphysics 54 (2):417-418.
The Philosophical Problems of Applied Mathematics.Robert Anderson Holland - 1989 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-05-08

Total views
12 ( #768,513 of 2,433,206 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #138,039 of 2,433,206 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes