Emotion Review 2 (2):182-183 (2010)

Williams and DeSteno (2010) and Gladkova (2010) question the validity, utility, and theoretical support for the bifurcation of pride into hubristic and authentic facets. Though these commentators highlight unanswered questions and important directions for future research, we argue that the broad, evolutionarily informed framework for the two facets, presented in our target article nonetheless provides the best fit and explanation for the existing pattern of evidence. We offer several empirical suggestions for future studies addressing the questions raised by the commentators, and emphasize the need for emotion researchers to hew closely to empirical data in developing theoretical accounts
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1754073909356004
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,518
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Pride in Parsimony.Lisa A. Williams & David DeSteno - 2010 - Emotion Review 2 (2):180-181.
A Linguist’s View of “Pride”.Anna Gladkova - 2010 - Emotion Review 2 (2):178-179.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
40 ( #256,997 of 2,421,640 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #124,149 of 2,421,640 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes