Resisting the Scaffold: Self-Preservation and Limits of Obligation in Hobbes's Leviathan

Hobbes Studies 24 (2):137-157 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The degree to which Hobbes's citizenry retains its right to resist sovereign power has been the source of a significant debate. It has been argued by a number of scholars that there is a clear avenue for legitimate rebellion in Hobbes's state, as described in the Leviathan - in this work, Hobbes asserts that subjects can retain their natural right to self-preservation in civil society, and that this represents an inalienable right that cannot, under any circumstances, be transferred to the sovereign. The conclusion frequently drawn from this feature of Hobbes's account is that it places a considerable limit on sovereign authority. The right to self-preservation has been taken as proof that Hobbes sought to ensure that the sovereign's power relies upon the continual consent of the individuals that make up his or her constituency. I want to examine Hobbes's account of this civil right in Leviathan in order to show that this line of interpretation is ultimately unfounded. While self-preservation results from the individual's own judgment of threats to her personal safety, it is justified in only the most strictly delineated contexts. Judgments regarding the overall peace and security of the state do not, and cannot, fall to individual experiences and judgments. Hobbes is quite adamant that individuals are not appropriate judges of right and wrong action in matters the sovereign legislates



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,466

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles


Added to PP

110 (#111,573)

6 months
1 (#417,143)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Patricia Sheridan
University of Guelph

Citations of this work

Hobbes on Teleology and Reason.Guido Parietti - 2017 - European Journal of Philosophy 25 (4):1107-1131.

Add more citations

References found in this work

.Donald Rutherford - 1993 - Penn St Univ Pr.
Hobbes's Political Theory.Deborah Baumgold - 1988 - Cambridge University Press.
Hobbes and Individualism.Alan Ryan - 1988 - In G. A. J. Rogers & Alan Ryan (eds.), Perspectives on Thomas Hobbes. Oxford University Press.
The Catching of Leviathan, or the Great Whale.John Bramhall - 1995 - In G. A. J. Rogers, Robert Filmer, George Lawson, John Bramhall & Edward Hyde Clarendon (eds.), Leviathan: Contemporary Responses to the Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes. Thoemmes Press.
Warrender and His Critics.Brian Barry - 1968 - Philosophy 43 (164):117 - 137.

Add more references