“Blurred Boundaries”? Rethinking the Concept of Craft and its Relation to Art and Design

Philosophy Compass 7 (4):230-244 (2012)
Abstract
Art world talk of “blurred boundaries” and “hybrids” between art and craft, suggests that the philosophy of art needs to rethink the concept of craft. This can best be done by adopting four strategies: first, distinguish between craft as a set of disciplines, and craft as a process and practice; second, keep in mind the differences among craft practices such as studio, trade, ethnic, amateur, and DIY; third, recognize that craft’s relationship with design is as important as its relationship to art; fourth, attend to the role digital design and fabrication are playing in craft and art today. At the core of the craft process are three contested characteristics found in most craft practices: hand, material, and skill, although these are better understood as body, medium, and mastery. After discussing a fourth contested characteristic of many craft and design practices, function, I show that none of the four characteristics is a requisite condition for artistic practice today, yet none are excluded from contemporary art, despite its current “post‐studio” or “post‐disciplinary” tendencies. I conclude that the boundary between art and craft conceived as a set of disciplines defined by materials and techniques has not become blurred, it has all but disappeared. On the other hand, I show through an analysis of some references to “mere craft” by Stephen Davies and Arthur Danto, that craft conceived as a process and practice can be understood as distinct from art, but in a non‐invidious sense
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00479.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,781
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Tacit Dimension.Michael Polanyi - 1966 - London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Art as Performance.Dave Davies - 2003 - Wiley-Blackwell.
The Aesthetic Function of Art.Gary Iseminger - 2004 - Cornell University Press.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Crossing Boundaries.Ben Tilghman - 2006 - British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (2):178-191.
Blur.Keith Allen - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (2):257-273.
Utility Reassessed: The Role of Ethics in the Practice of Design.Judy Attfield (ed.) - 1999 - Distributed Exclusively in the Usa by St. Martin's Press.
Vagueness in Reality.Timothy Williamson - 2003 - In Michael J. Loux & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
Blurred Conditionals.Angelika Kratzer - 1981 - In W. Klein & W. Levelt (eds.), Crossing the Boundaries in Linguistics. Reidel. pp. 201--209.
Other Than Identity: The Subject, Politics and Art.Juliet Steyn (ed.) - 1997 - Distributed Exclusively in the Usa by St. Martin's Press.
The Dancing Ru: A Confucian Aesthetics of Virtue.Nicholas F. Gier - 2001 - Philosophy East and West 51 (2):280-305.
Entertainment: A Question for Aesthetics.Richard Shusterman - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (3):289-307.
A Cognitive Approach to the Earliest Art.Johan de Smedt & Helen de Cruz - 2011 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 69 (4):379-389.
Art and Audience.Nick Zangwill - 1999 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 57 (3):315-332.
Added to PP index
2012-03-20

Total downloads
45 ( #119,880 of 2,199,707 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #149,569 of 2,199,707 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature