A Study of Deviance as a Retaliatory Response to Organizational Power

Journal of Business Ethics 92 (4):553-563 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a time when ethical scandals are commonplace in the media, one begins to wonder just what organizations are doing wrong. This article analyzes the Fall 2006 boardroom spying scandal at Hewlett–Packard to determine whether the workplace deviance observed can be linked to a retaliatory response to organizational power. A summary of the events leading up to, during, and the fall-out of the scandal is reported.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Business Obligations for Human Rights.Michelle Westermann-Behaylo, Harry J. Van Buren Iii & Shawn L. Berman - 2011 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 22:189-201.
Business Obligations for Human Rights.Michelle Westermann-Behaylo, Harry J. van Buren Iii & Shawn L. Berman - 2011 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 22:189-201.
A study in modal deviance.Gideon Rosen - 2002 - In John Hawthorne & Tamar Gendler (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford University Press. pp. 283--307.
Institutions and deviance: Art and psychiatry.Laurie Calhoun - 1994 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 8 (3):393-409.
Attributions and avowals of motive in the study of deviance: Resource or topic?Timothy Berard - 1998 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 28 (2):193–213.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-08-08

Downloads
48 (#330,129)

6 months
9 (#302,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?