Knowledge Doesn’t Require Epistemic Certainty

Logos and Episteme 10 (4):449-450 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a recent discussion note in this journal, Moti Mizrahi offers us the following argument for the conclusion that knowledge requires epistemic certainty:1) If S knows that p on the grounds that e, then p cannot be false given e.2) If p cannot be false given e, then e makes p epistemically certain.3) Therefore, if S knows that p on the grounds that e, then e makes p epistemically certain. I’ll argue that premise 2 of Mizrahi’s argument is false, and so Mizrahi’s argument is unsound.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Factivity or Grounds? Comment on Mizrahi.Howard Sankey - 2019 - Logos and Episteme 10 (3):333-4.
Self supporting evidence.Daniel Greco - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (8):2665-2673.
Knowledge, Certainty, and Factivity.Jeffrey Hoops - 2020 - Logos and Episteme 11 (2):237-243.
A Cumulative Case Argument for Infallibilism.Nevin Climenhaga - 2021 - In Christos Kyriacou & Kevin Wallbridge (eds.), Skeptical Invariantism Reconsidered. Routledge.
Gettier Unscathed for Now.John C. Duff - 2022 - Logos and Episteme 13 (3):317-323.
Knowledge from Knowledge.Rodrigo Borges - 2020 - American Philosophical Quarterly 57 (3):283 - 297.
Knowledge despite falsehood.Martin Montminy - 2014 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44 (3-4):463-475.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-07

Downloads
15 (#976,359)

6 months
4 (#862,833)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Simpson
University of Florida

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references