The Report Versus the Transparency Models of Appreciation: The Case of Comics

Canadian Journal of Philosophy:1-11 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

On the report model of appreciating fiction, one imagines learning about a fictional world through a report: reading or viewing someone’s account or listening to them tell their story. On the transparency model, one simply imagines the things that are fictional in the story, without imagining anything about how that information is acquired. It is argued that the transparency model is the default, in literature and cinema, but in comics, it is the report model that is the default.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,953

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-05-21

Downloads
10 (#1,220,343)

6 months
10 (#309,174)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bradford Skow
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Truth in fiction.David K. Lewis - 1978 - American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (1):37–46.
Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts.Kendall L. Walton - 1990 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 49 (2):161-166.
Pictures and make-believe.Kendall Walton - 1973 - Philosophical Review 82 (3):283-319.
Drawings of Photographs in Comics.Roy T. Cook - 2012 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70 (1):129-138.
Visual fictions.Gregory Currie - 1991 - Philosophical Quarterly 41 (163):129-143.

View all 10 references / Add more references