Clark Glymour. Discussion: Hypothetico-deductivism is hopeless. Philosophy of science, vol. 47 , pp. 322–325. - C. Kenneth Waters. Relevance logic brings hope to hypothetico-deductivism. Philosophy of science, vol. 54 , pp. 453–464. - Thomas R. Grimes. Discussion: Truth, content, and the hypothetico-deductive method. Philosophy of science, vol. 57 , pp. 514–522 [Book Review]

Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (2):756-758 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Corrections: Hypothetico-Deductivism Is Hopeless.[author unknown] - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (3):503-503.
Horwich, Hempel, and hypothetico-deductivism.Ken Gemes - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (4):699-702.
Glymour on evidential relevance.David Christensen - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (3):471-481.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-05

Downloads
31 (#502,424)

6 months
6 (#701,066)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brian Skyrms
University of California, Irvine

Citations of this work

Mathematical Explanation by Law.Sam Baron - 2019 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 70 (3):683-717.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references