Philosophical Quarterly 28 (October):339-41 (1978)
It has been said that physicalism is an empty doctrine, Because if new forces are needed to explain biological or psychological phenomena they will have to be incorporated into physics. In reply it is argued that we can tie physicalism to present day physics. There may be revolutionary changes in physics but these are likely to affect only the field of elementary particles and cosmology. Our understanding of such things as the nervous system or of protein molecules is unlikely to be affected
|Keywords||Metaphysics Mind Physicalism Chomsky, N|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Two Conceptions of the Physical.Daniel Stoljar - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (2):253 - 281.
The Modal Status of Materialism.Joseph Levine & Kelly Trogdon - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 145 (3):351 - 362.
Similar books and articles
Non-Reductive Physicalism?A. D. Smith - 1993 - In Howard M. Robinson (ed.), Objections to Physicalism. Oxford University Press.
Some Evidence for Physicalism.Andrew Melnyk - 2003 - In Sven Walter & Heinz-Dieter Heckmann (eds.), Physicalism and Mental Causation. Imprint Academic. pp. 155-172.
The Physical: Empirical, Not Metaphysical.J. L. Dowell, & Janice Dowell - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 131 (1):25-60.
The Significance of Emergence.Tim Crane - 2001 - In Carl Gillett & Barry M. Loewer (eds.), Physicalism and its Discontents. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads194 ( #22,506 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #39,620 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?