The content of physicalism

Philosophical Quarterly 28 (October):339-41 (1978)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It has been said that physicalism is an empty doctrine, Because if new forces are needed to explain biological or psychological phenomena they will have to be incorporated into physics. In reply it is argued that we can tie physicalism to present day physics. There may be revolutionary changes in physics but these are likely to affect only the field of elementary particles and cosmology. Our understanding of such things as the nervous system or of protein molecules is unlikely to be affected

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
20 (#793,209)

6 months
333 (#6,275)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings.David John Chalmers (ed.) - 2002 - New York: Oxford University Press USA.
Physicalism.Daniel Stoljar - 2015 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Two Conceptions of the Physical.Daniel Stoljar - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (2):253-281.
The Mind/Brain Identity Theory.Jjc Smart - 2007 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Defining physicalism.Alyssa Ney - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (5):1033-1048.

View all 38 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references