Kirk on Quine's reasons for indeterminacy of translation

Philosophical Studies 27 (6):427 - 431 (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An argument given by kirk ("analysis" 33.6) against quine's 1970 defense of his indeterminacy thesis is discussed. It is shown that kirk's claim that quine's argument is self-Defeating is unacceptable

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Quine's dilemma.Roger F. Gibson - 1986 - Synthese 69 (1):27 - 39.
Kripkenstein: Rule and Indeterminacy.Xin Sheen Liu - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 32:67-75.
Quine – Peter Hylton. [REVIEW]Rogério Passos Severo - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (237):738-740.
On the reasons for indeterminacy of translation.W. V. Quine - 1970 - Journal of Philosophy 67 (6):178-183.
Synonymy and the epistemology of linguistics.Jay F. Rosenberg - 1967 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):405-420.
On How to Avoid the Indeterminacy of Translation.Panu Raatikainen - 2005 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 43 (3):395-413.
Indeterminacy and interpretation.Günter Abel - 1994 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 37 (4):403 – 419.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
49 (#324,348)

6 months
4 (#787,709)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references