Consent for anaesthesia

Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (3):286-290 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

“Informed consent” is a legal instrument that allows individuals to define their own interests and to protect their bodily privacy. In current medical practice, patients who have consented to surgery are considered to have implied consent to anaesthesia, even though anaesthesia is associated with its own particular set of risks and consequences that are quite separate from those associated with surgery. In addition, anaesthetists often perform interventions that are the only medical treatment received by a patient. Anaesthetists, therefore, should always obtain separate consent for anaesthesia, and should regard the process of consent as a stimulus for active, fluid reciprocal discussion with patients about treatment options

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Consent for anaesthesia in cataract surgery.S. Kashani - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (9):555-555.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
31 (#502,760)

6 months
11 (#340,569)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making.Allen E. Buchanan & Dan W. Brock - 1989 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Dan W. Brock.
Medical paternalism.Allen Buchanan - 1978 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 7 (4):370-390.
Paternalism modernised.G. B. Weiss - 1985 - Journal of Medical Ethics 11 (4):184-187.
Examining consent within the patient-doctor relationship.M. A. Habiba - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (3):183-187.

View all 6 references / Add more references