Argumentum ad feminam

Journal of Social Philosophy 22 (1):5-19 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The last issue of this journal published an exchange between Marilyn Friedman and me that had taken place at a lively session of the American Philosophical Association in December, 1990. Friedman's paper “‘They Lived Happily Ever After’: Sommers on Women and Marriage” was a barbed critique of my views on the family. My rejoinder, “Do These Feminist Like Women?” pointed out that Friedman's orthodox brand of feminism was not sensitive to the values and aspirations of most American women. That issue of the Journal of Social Philosophy also published a third paper of Friedman's “Does Sommers Like Women?” twice as long again as my rejoinder. This second critique went further into earlier writings of mine raising new issues, and criticizing me in rather unpleasant ad feminam ways. If an uncharacteristic asperity colors my response, it is because I do not find myself able to deal coolly and impersonally with the accusation that I intentionally misrepresent some of the feminist philosophers I criticize

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

"They lived happily ever after": Sommers on women and marriage.Marilyn Friedman - 1990 - Journal of Social Philosophy 21 (2-3):57-58.
Rape and Persuasive Definition.Keith Burgess-Jackson - 1995 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):415 - 454.
Response to Commentators on Waking, Dreaming, Being.Evan Thompson - 2016 - Philosophy East and West 66 (3):982-1000.
Feminist reflections on miscarriage, in light of abortion.Kate Parsons - 2010 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 3 (1):1.
Feminism, Food, and the Politics of Home Cooking.Alison Reiheld - 2008 - American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy 8 (1):19-20.
Neutrality, Choice, and Contexts of Oppression.Lisa H. Schwartzman - 2005 - Social Philosophy Today 21:193-206.
Neutrality, Choice, and Contexts of Oppression.Lisa H. Schwartzman - 2005 - Social Philosophy Today 21:193-206.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
27 (#608,699)

6 months
2 (#1,259,303)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Rape and Persuasive Definition.Keith Burgess-Jackson - 1995 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):415 - 454.
Who's Afraid of Feminism? [REVIEW]Susan Dwyer - 1996 - Dialogue 35 (2):327-342.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references