Death Talk, Second Edition: The Case Against Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide

Mcgill-Queen's University Press (2014)

Abstract
Death Talk asks why, when our society has rejected euthanasia for over two thousand years, are we now considering legalizing it? Has euthanasia been promoted by deliberately confusing it with other ethically acceptable acts? What is the relation between pain relief treatments that could shorten life and euthanasia? How do journalistic values and media ethics affect the public's perception of euthanasia? What impact would the legalization of euthanasia have on concepts of human rights, human responsibilities, and human ethics? Can we imagine teaching young physicians how to put their patients to death? There are vast ethical, legal, and social differences between natural death and euthanasia. In Death Talk, Margaret Somerville argues that legalizing euthanasia would cause irreparable harm to society's value of respect for human life, which in secular societies is carried primarily by the institutions of law and medicine. Death has always been a central focus of the discussion that we engage in as individuals and as a society in searching for meaning in life. Moreover, we accommodate the inevitable reality of death into the living of our lives by discussing it, that is, through "death talk." Until the last twenty years this discussion occurred largely as part of the practice of organized religion. Today, in industrialized western societies, the euthanasia debate provides a context for such discussion and is part of the search for a new societal-cultural paradigm. Seeking to balance the "death talk" articulated in the euthanasia debate with "life talk," Somerville identifies the very serious harms for individuals and society that would result from accepting euthanasia. A sense of the unfolding euthanasia debate is captured through the inclusion of Somerville's responses to or commentaries on several other authors' contributions.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 9780773543768
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,719
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Deathbed Disputation.Peter Singer - 2002 - Canadian Medical Association Journal 166 (8).
Ending Life, Morality, and Meaning.Jukka Varelius - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (3):559-574.
Death is Not Always the Greatest Evil: Killing and Letting Die in Bioethics.James Green - 2002 - Dissertation, Queen's University at Kingston (Canada)
Not in My Name.Jacqueline A. Laing - 2012 - New Law Journal 162:81.
Should Physicians Assist the Reaper?Joram Graf Haber - 1996 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 5 (1):44.
Levinas and the Euthanasia Debate.A. T. Nuyen - 2000 - Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (1):119 - 135.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-08-22

Total views
6 ( #1,042,618 of 2,349,835 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #511,368 of 2,349,835 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes