Natural history and variability of organized beings in Kant's philosophy

Belgrade Philosophical Annual 35 (1):91-107 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper aims to examine Kant's views on evolution of organized beings and to show that Kant's antievolutionary conclusions stem from his study of natural history and variability of organisms. Accordingly, I discuss Kant's study of natural history and consider whether his conclusion about impossibility of knowledge about such history expands on the research of history of organized beings. Moving forward, I examine the notion of variability in Kant's philosophy, and show that his theory of organized beings relies on the preformationist conception of variability that provides limited insight into the history of organisms. I explain that Kant's endorsement of preformationism is conditioned by a lack of knowledge about the mechanism that successfully explains adaptation and transmutation of organisms leading towards the creation of new species. Finally, I sumarize the following reasons for Kant's rejection of the hypothesis of evolution: lack of cognitive ability to discover all changes of natural phenomena in different periods of time and adoption of preformationist conception of variability of organized beings. I finish off with a discussion about mechanical inexplicability of organisms and find a third reason Kant believes that the idea of evolution is only "a daring adventure on the part of reason".

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant's biological conception of history.Alix Cohen - 2008 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (1):1-28.
“Stahl Was Often Closer to the Truth”: Kant’s Second Thoughts on Animism, Monadology, and Hylozoism.Paolo Pecere - 2021 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 11 (2):660-678.
Kant's "naturalistic" history of mankind? Some reservations.John Zammito - 2008 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (1):29-62.
Kant's Theory of Justice.David Johnston - 2011 - In A Brief History of Justice. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 142–166.
Kant's Parasite: Sublime Biodeconstruction.Jonathan Basile - 2019 - CR: The New Centennial Review 19 (3):173-200.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-11-29

Downloads
11 (#1,146,652)

6 months
7 (#592,566)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bogdana Stamenković
University of Belgrade

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Kant and Blumenbach on the Bildungstrieb: A Historical Misunderstanding.Robert J. Richards - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 31 (1):11-32.
Kant's Biological Teleology and Its Philosophical Significance.Hannah Ginsborg - 2006 - In Graham Bird (ed.), A Companion to Kant. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 455–469.
Kant’s Physical Geography and the Critical Philosophy.Robert R. Clewis - 2018 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy.
Kant on Understanding Organisms as Natural Purposes.Hannah Ginsborg - 2001 - In Eric Watkins (ed.), Kant and the Sciences. New York, US: Oxford University Press.
Kant, teleology, and evolution.Daniel Kolb - 1992 - Synthese 91 (1-2):9 - 28.

View all 9 references / Add more references