The Definition of a Right

Jurisprudence 3 (2):319-339 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some version of the will theory and the interest theory of rights attempt to provide a precise and normatively neutral definition of a right that would be useful in substantive normative debates and that corresponds reasonably well with usage in our political and legal culture. But there is an irresolvable tension in this project. Consistent application of a definition of a right cannot plausible track ordinary usage without invoking underlying normative propositions about the justifications for granting rights. Thus, definitional approaches to rights are too demanding to serve either the descriptive purpose of providing a neutral vocabulary or the normative purpose of usefully discussing the rights we ought to have. For descriptive purposes, it would be better to retreat, if necessary, to the Hohfeldian idea that a right is nothing more than the correlate of a duty; for normative purposes, it would be better to address directly the political justification for characterizing a particular legal as creating a right

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The mythology of human rights.Gunnar Beck - 2008 - Ratio Juris 21 (3):312-347.
On defining “mental disorder”: Purposes and conditions of adequacy.Bengt Brülde - 2010 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (1):19-33.
The nature and basis of inalienable rights.Terrance McConnell - 1984 - Law and Philosophy 3 (1):25 - 59.
Buddhist Compassion as a Foundation for Human Rights.Eugene Rice - 2005 - Social Philosophy Today 21:95-108.
A cognitive access definition of privacy.Madison Powers - 1996 - Law and Philosophy 15 (4):369 - 386.
Rights: Beyond interest theory and will theory? [REVIEW]Rowan Cruft - 2004 - Law and Philosophy 23 (4):347 - 397.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-01

Downloads
31 (#519,480)

6 months
3 (#984,149)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

What Is the Will Theory of Rights?David Frydrych - 2019 - Ratio Juris 32 (4):455-472.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The metaphysics of morals.Immanuel Kant - 1797/1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Mary J. Gregor.
The Nature of Rights.Leif Wenar - 2005 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (3):223-252.
A hybrid theory of claim-rights.Gopal Sreenivasan - 2005 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 25 (2):257-274.
Theories of Rights: Is There a Third Way?Matthew H. Kramer & Hillel Steiner - 2005 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27 (2):281-310.

View all 7 references / Add more references