Canadian Journal of Philosophy 49 (1):1-21 (2019)

Authors
David Killoren
Australian Catholic University
Abstract
We distinguish two conceptions of confinement – the agential conception and the comparative conception – and show that the former is intimately related to use in a way that the latter is not. Specifically, in certain conditions, agential confinement constitutes use and creates a special relationship that makes neglect or abuse especially egregious. This allows us to develop and defend an account of one important way in which agential confinement can be morally wrong. We then discuss some of the account’s practical implications, including its usefulness for decision-making in real-world contexts in which animals are confined.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/00455091.2018.1534194
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,046
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
On What Matters: Two-Volume Set.Derek Parfit - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 2002 - Mind 111 (442):323-354.
Animal Ethics in Context.Clare Palmer - 2010 - Columbia University Press.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Pervasive Captivity and Urban Wildlife.Nicolas Delon - 2020 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 23 (2):123-143.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Liberty and Valuing Sentient Life. Hadley - 2013 - Ethics and the Environment 18 (1):87-103.
Beyond Dehumanization: A Post-Humanist Critique of Intensive Confinement.Lisa Guenther - 2012 - Journal of Critical Animal Studies. Special Issue on Animals and Prisons 10 (2).
The Ethics of Captivity Ed. By Lori Gruen.Kelly Struthers Montford & Chloë Taylor - 2016 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 26 (2):43-51.
Limitations on the Confinement of Food Animals in the United States.Terence J. Centner - 2010 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (5):469-486.
The Confinement of Animals Used in Laboratory Research.Robert Streiffer - 2014 - In Lori Gruen (ed.), The Ethics of Captivity. Oxford University Press. pp. 174-192.
Liberty, Beneficence, and Involuntary Confinement.Joan C. Callahan - 1984 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9 (3):261-294.
Leakproofing the Singularity.Roman V. Yampolskiy - 2012 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 19 (1-2):194-214.
Leakproofing the Singularity Artificial Intelligence Confinement Problem.Roman Yampolskiy - 2012 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 19 (1-2):194-214.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-10-16

Total views
54 ( #198,955 of 2,454,484 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #303,425 of 2,454,484 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes