In Alfred Schramm (ed.), Meinong Studien. De Gruyter. pp. 309-330 (2005)

Authors
Vojko Strahovnik
University of Ljubljana
Abstract
Some commitments at the interface of semantics and ontology, such as numbers or symphonies, tend to appear problematic. The scorekeeping approach to semantics introduces contextually shifting parameters that allow for construal of truth as indirect correspondence. Meinong did recognize diversity and richness that is made possible by the non-reductionist engagement of the scorekeeping approach. Because of his commitment to the deep presupposition of direct correspondence construal of truth though, Meinong had to interpret richness of normative discursive scorekeeping commitments as richness of ontological strata, features and engagements. Once as Meinong recognizes the construal of truth as indirect correspondence, many problems related to his objects dissolve, naturally placing his scorekeeping discovery into discursive normative setting. A translation of Meinongian objects into discursive scores confirms that his discovery aims at these indeed, which is obscured by his sticking to the construal of truth as direct correspondence.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1515/9783110333190.309
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,548
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Scorekeeping in a Language Game.David K. Lewis - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):339--359.
Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology.Rudolf Carnap - 2011 - In Robert B. Talisse & Scott F. Aikin (eds.), The Pragmatism Reader: From Peirce Through the Present. Princeton University Press. pp. 249-264.
Noneism or Allism?David K. Lewis - 1990 - Mind 99 (393):23-31.
Meinongian Logic.Dale Jacquette - 1999 - Studia Logica 63 (2):280-285.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Ontological Reflections on What There Is.Matjaž Potrč & Vojko Strahovnik - 2019 - Open Journal of Philosophy 9 (2):140-151.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Conversational Scorekeeping and Conditionals.Donald Nute - 1980 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 9 (2):153 - 166.
Meinong, Alexius; I: Meinongian Semantics.William J. Rapaport - 1991 - In Hans Burkhardt & Barry Smith (eds.), Handbook of Metaphysics and Ontology. Philosophia Verlag. pp. 516-519.
Is Lewis a Meinongian?Bernard Linsky & Edward N. Zalta - 1991 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69 (4):438–453.
Scorekeeping in a Defective Language Game.Kevin A. Scharp - 2005 - Pragmatics and Cognition 13 (1):203-226.
Particularist Semantic Normativity.Terry Horgan & Matjaž Potrč - 2006 - Acta Analytica 21 (1):45-61.
Abundant Truth in an Austere World.Horgan Terry & Potrč Matjaž - 2006 - In Patrick Greenough & Michael P. Lynch (eds.), Truth and Realism. Oxford University Press. pp. 137--167.
Brandom on Communication.Kevin Scharp - forthcoming - In Jason Hannon & Robert Rutland (eds.), Philosophical Profiles in the Theory of Communication. McGill-Queen's University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
57 ( #166,875 of 2,348,322 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #510,851 of 2,348,322 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes