Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2):217-232 (2012)
AbstractIn Plato’s Sophist (245e–247e) an argument against metaphysical materialism in the “battle of gods and giants” is presented which is oft the cause of consternation, primarily because it appears the characters are unfair to the materialist position. Attempts to explain it usually resort to restructuring the argument while others rearrange the Sophist entirely to rebuild the argument in a more satisfying form. I propose a different account of the argument that does not rely on a disservice to the materialist nor restructuring Plato’s argument. I contend, instead, that the argument is enthymematic in nature, allowing the definitions employed to flow out of the reasoning as originally presented. Moreover, it suggests that Plato’s idealism was so deeply ingrained that modern defenses of materialism were not even live options.
Similar books and articles
A Deconstruction of Plato’s “Battle of Gods and Giants”.John M. Berry - 1986 - Southwest Philosophy Review 3:28-39.
The Battle of the Gods and Giants: The Legacies of Descartes and Gassendi, 1655-1715.José Raimundo Maia Neto - 1995 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 33 (1):174-176.
In Being One Only One? The Argument for the Uniqueness of the Platonic Forms.Anna Marmodoro - 2008 - Apeiron (4):211-227.
Form and Argument in Late Plato.Christopher Gill & Mary Margaret McCabe (eds.) - 1996 - Oxford University Press.
Philosopher-Kings: The Argument of Plato’s Republic.C. D. C. Reeve - 1988 - Hackett Pub. Co..
The Carpenter and the Good.Rachel Barney - 2008 - In D. Cairns, F. G. Herrmann & T. Penner (eds.), Pursuing the Good: Ethics and Metaphysics in Plato's Republic. University of Edinburgh.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads