Those Frightening Men: A New Interpretation of Plato’s Battle of Gods and Giants

Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2):217-232 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Plato’s Sophist (245e–247e) an argument against metaphysical materialism in the “battle of gods and giants” is presented which is oft the cause of consternation, primarily because it appears the characters are unfair to the materialist position. Attempts to explain it usually resort to restructuring the argument while others rearrange the Sophist entirely to rebuild the argument in a more satisfying form. I propose a different account of the argument that does not rely on a disservice to the materialist nor restructuring Plato’s argument. I contend, instead, that the argument is enthymematic in nature, allowing the definitions employed to flow out of the reasoning as originally presented. Moreover, it suggests that Plato’s idealism was so deeply ingrained that modern defenses of materialism were not even live options.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,346

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-06-01

Downloads
42 (#280,303)

6 months
2 (#299,341)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bradley Strawser
Naval Postgraduate School

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references