Demarcating a Pure Land: CFido as a Cyberspace for Computer Amateurs in 1990s China

Isis 115 (2):267-291 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The bulletin board system (BBS) significantly changed the production and transmission of knowledge in China’s information technology (IT). Launched in 1991, Chinese FidoNet (CFido) provided a virtual space for hobbyists to explore technology-for-fun and aggregated many future Chinese digital entrepreneurs, enabling them to experiment with business models and pursue open-source software with Chinese characters. CFido’s short history (1991–1998) also encapsulates the fast-changing dynamic between knowledge and its social context. CFido participants first perceived the BBS as a utopian “pure land” where grassroots intellectuals could develop software and digital technologies, free from outside interests and interventions. Yet the beginning of government control of cyberspace, the boom of the IT industry and e-commerce, and the transition from the dial-up BBS to the Internet led the CFidoers to diverging positions about amateurs and ultimately brought CFido to an end.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophy of Cyberspace, Society, Culture and Transparency in ICTs.Fivos Papadimitriou - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 46:41-46.
The Political Economy of Open-Source Software in the United Kingdom.Steven Kettell - 2008 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 28 (4):306-315.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-05-21

Downloads
9 (#1,279,545)

6 months
9 (#355,912)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Chen-Pang Yeang
University of Toronto

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The cathedral and the bazaar.Eric Raymond - 1999 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 12 (3):23-49.

Add more references