Reproductive Genetic Medicine in a Post- Dobbs World: Will it Make Life Harder for People with Genetic Disease?

&
Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 51 (3):511-517 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Post-Dobbs abortion restrictions impact access and choice in the context of reproductive genetic medicine, raising serious reproductive justice concerns. The consequences of these restrictions are particularly acute and far-reaching for individuals with genetic conditions and their families.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/jme.2023.128

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Where Does Life Begin? Discerning the Impact of Dobbs on Assisted Reproductive Technologies.Judith Daar - 2023 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 51 (3):518-527.
Risk, medicine and women: A case study on prenatal genetic counselling in Brazil.Maria Cristina R. Guilam & Marilena C. D. V. Corrêa - 2007 - Developing World Bioethics 7 (2):78–85.
Can reproductive genetic manipulation save lives?G. Owen Schaefer - 2020 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy (3):381-386.
A Critique of a 'Wrongful Life' Lawsuit in Korea.Young-Rhan Um - 2000 - Nursing Ethics 7 (3):250-261.
Reconciling the disability critique and reproductive liberty: The case of negative genetic selection.Melinda C. Hall - 2013 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 6 (1):121-143.
Reproductive Technologies and Free Speech.Sonia M. Suter - 2021 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 49 (4):514-530.
Genetic and reproductive technologies in the light of religious dialogue.Stephen M. Modell - 2007 - Zygon 42 (1):163-182.
Eugenics and Mandatory Informed Prenatal Genetic Testing: A Unique Perspective from China.Zhang Di, Vincent H. Ng, Zhaochen Wang, Xiaomei Zhai & Reidar K. Lie - 2015 - Developing World Bioethics 16 (2):107-115.
From Sancitity to Screening: Genetic Disabilities, Risk and Rhetorical Strategies in Wrongful Birth and Wrongful Conception Cases. [REVIEW]Robin Mackenzie - 1999 - Feminist Legal Studies 7 (2):175-191.
The Reproductive Injustices of Abortion Bans for Disability.Leslie Francis - 2023 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 51 (3):490-496.
Prenatal Genetic Screening, Epistemic Justice, and Reproductive Autonomy.Amber Knight & Joshua Miller - 2021 - Hypatia 36 (1):1-21.
The contribution of comparative research to the development and testing of life history models of human attachment and reproductive strategies.Dario Maestripieri - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):37-38.
Reproductive CRISPR does not cure disease.Tina Rulli - 2019 - Bioethics 33 (9):1072-1082.
The limitations of liberal reproductive autonomy.J. Y. Lee - 2022 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 25 (3):523-529.
INTRODUCTION: Securing Reproductive Justice After Dobbs.Aziza Ahmed, Nicole Huberfeld & Linda C. McClain - 2023 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 51 (3):463-467.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-14

Downloads
3 (#1,708,708)

6 months
3 (#965,065)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references