Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):572-579 (2016)

Authors
Ben Sweeting
University of Brighton
Abstract
Context: The relationship between design and science has shifted over recent decades. One bridge between the two is cybernetics, which offers perspectives on both in terms of their practice. From around 1980 onwards, drawing on ideas from cybernetics, Glanville has suggested that rather than apply science to design, it makes more sense to understand science as a form of design activity, reversing the more usual hierarchy between the two. I return to review this argument here, in the context of recent discussions in this journal regarding second-order science has tended to be associated with theory. As a result, SOC is perceived as separate to the more tangible aspects of earlier cybernetics in a way that obscures both the continuity between the two and also current opportunities for developing the field. Method: I review Glanville’s understanding of design, and particularly his account of scientific research as a design-like activity, placing this within the context of the shifting relation between science and design during the development of SOC, with reference to the work of Rittel and Feyerabend. Through this, I summarise significant parallels and overlaps between SOC and the contemporary concerns of design research. Results: I suggest that we can see design research not just as a field influenced by cybernetics but as a form of SOC practice even where cybernetics is not explicitly referenced. Implications: Given this, design research offers much to cybernetics as an important example of SOC that is both outward looking and practice based. As such, it bridges the gap between SOC and the more tangible legacy of earlier cybernetics, while also suggesting connections to contemporary concerns in this journal with SOS in terms of researching research. Constructivist content: By suggesting that we see design research as an example of SOC, I develop connections between constructivism and practice.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2017
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,194
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Digital Design Research and Second-Order Cybernetics.M. de Sousa van Stralen - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):586-587.
What Can Cybernetics Learn From Design?C. M. Herr - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):583-585.
Design Cycles: Conversing with Lawrence Halprin.T. Scholte - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):579-581.
Methodological Innovation in Practice-Based Design Doctorates.Joyce S. R. Yee - 2010 - Journal of Research Practice 6 (2):Article M15.
Rigor in Research, Honesty and Values.M. Hohl - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):585-586.
Author’s Response: Beyond Application.B. Sweeting - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):591-597.
A Theatre for Exploring the Cybernetic.B. Sweeting - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):619-620.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-07-15

Total views
14 ( #707,217 of 2,448,338 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #450,727 of 2,448,338 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes