- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Frequentist versus Bayesian Clinical Trials
In Fred Gifford (ed.), Philosophy of Medicine. Boston: Elsevier (2011)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Bayesian versus frequentist clinical trials.Cecillia Nardini - 2016 - In Miriam Solomon, Jeremy R. Simon & Harold Kincaid (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Medicine. New York, NY: Routledge.
Bayesian versus frequentist clinical trials.David Teira - 2011 - In Fred Gifford (ed.), Philosophy of Medicine. Boston: Elsevier. pp. 255-297.
A case for Bayesianism in clinical trials (with discussion).Donald A. Berry - 1993 - Statistics in Medicine 12 (15-16):1377-1393.
The Role of Randomization in Bayesian and Frequentist Design of Clinical Trial.Paola Berchialla, Dario Gregori & Ileana Baldi - 2019 - Topoi 38 (2):469-475.
Bayeswatch: an overview of Bayesian statistics.Peter C. Austin, Lawrence J. Brunner & S. M. Janet E. Hux Md - 2002 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 8 (2):277-286.
The ethics of randomised controlled trials: A matter of statistical belief? [REVIEW]Jane L. Hutton - 1996 - Health Care Analysis 4 (2):95-102.
A comparison of a Bayesian vs. a frequentist method for profiling hospital performance.Peter C. Austin, C. David Naylor & Jack V. Tu - 2001 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 7 (1):35-45.
Bayesian and frequentist models: legitimate choices for different purposes of clinical research.Zackary Berger - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (6):1045-1047.
Ethics and statistical methodology in clinical trials.C. R. Palmer - 1993 - Journal of Medical Ethics 19 (4):219-222.
Statistics‐based research – a pig in a poke?James Penston - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):862-867.
Analytics
Added to PP
2012-05-17
Downloads
1 (#1,722,932)
6 months
1 (#1,912,481)
2012-05-17
Downloads
1 (#1,722,932)
6 months
1 (#1,912,481)
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Epistemology of causal inference in pharmacology: Towards a framework for the assessment of harms.Juergen Landes, Barbara Osimani & Roland Poellinger - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 8 (1):3-49.
Problems with using mechanisms to solve the problem of extrapolation.Jeremy Howick, Paul Glasziou & Jeffrey K. Aronson - 2013 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (4):275-291.
Evidence amalgamation, plausibility, and cancer research.Marta Bertolaso & Fabio Sterpetti - 2019 - Synthese 196 (8):3279-3317.
Hunting Side Effects and Explaining Them: Should We Reverse Evidence Hierarchies Upside Down?Barbara Osimani - 2014 - Topoi 33 (2):295-312.
The Pursuit of Knowledge and the Problem of the Unconceived Alternatives.Fabio Sterpetti & Marta Bertolaso - 2020 - Topoi 39 (4):881-892.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-xdvnm uwo