The acceptability among French lay persons of ending the lives of damaged newborns

Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (11):701-708 (2009)

Background: Lay persons’ judgements of the acceptability of the not uncommon practice of ending the life of a damaged neonate have not been studied. Methods: A convenience sample of 1635 lay people in France rated how acceptable it would be for a physician to end a neonate’s life—by withholding care, withdrawing care, or active euthanasia—in 54 scenarios in which the neonate was diagnosed either with perinatal asphyxia or a genetic abnormality. The scenarios were all combinations of four factors: three levels of maturity or immaturity, three levels of severity of the health problem, three levels of parents’ preference concerning prolonging care and two levels of decision-making (with or without consulting the other caregivers). Analyses: Analyses of variance of the participants’ responses were performed to determine the importance of each factor; the interactions among factors, with methods of ending life and with other patient characteristics; and the differences between asphyxia and genetic abnormality. A cluster analysis was performed to look for groups with different patterns of responses. Results: Lay people assigned most importance to the parents’ request and to the severity of the problem. Except for a small group (12%) always opposed to ending life, they used a simple additive-type rule in integrating the information. Implications: Most of this sample of French lay people are not categorically for or against ending the life of a damaged neonate, but judge its degree of acceptability by adding up those factors that seem most salient to them
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.2009.029686
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,626
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Acceptability of Ending a Patient's Life.M. Guedj - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (6):311-317.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Personhood, Potentiality, and Normativity.Michael Gorman - 2011 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85 (3):483-498.
The Acceptability of Ending a Patient's Life.M. Guedj - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (6):311-317.
Killing Fetuses and Killing Newborns.Ezio Di Nucci - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):19-20.
Morally Wrong Beauty as a Source of Value.León María José Alcaraz - 2011 - Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 22 (40-41).
Ending Lives.Robert Campbell - 1988 - B. Blackwell in Association with the Open University.
Corporations as Intentional Systems.William G. Weaver - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (1):87 - 97.
Acceptability in France of Induced Abortion for Adolescents. Mar - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (8):26 – 32.
Assisted Suicide, Suffering and the Meaning of a Life.Miles Little - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (3):287-298.
Public Policy and Ending Lives.Evert van Leeuwen & Gerrit Kimsma - 2007 - In Rosamond Rhodes, Leslie Francis & Anita Silvers (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Medical Ethics. Blackwell.


Added to PP index

Total views
19 ( #399,143 of 2,325,929 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #79,217 of 2,325,929 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature