Neurolaw and Neuroprediction: Potential Promises and Perils

Philosophy Compass 7 (9):631-642 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Neuroscience has been proposed for use in the legal system for purposes of mind reading, assessment of responsibility, and prediction of misconduct. Each of these uses has both promises and perils, and each raises issues regarding the admissibility of neuroscientific evidence

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/phco.2012.7.issue-9

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Neurolaw and Neuroprediction: Potential Promises and Perils.Thomas Nadelhoffer & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (9):631-642.
Neuroprediction, violence, and the law: setting the stage.Thomas Nadelhoffer, Stephanos Bibas, Scott Grafton, Kent A. Kiehl, Andrew Mansfield, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Michael Gazzaniga - 2010 - Neuroethics 5 (1):67-99.
Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility Volume 5: Themes From the Philosophy of Gary Watson.D. Justin Coates & Neal A. Tognazzini (eds.) - 2019 - Oxford University Press.
Neuroscience and Criminal Law: Perils and Promises.Stephen J. Morse - 2019 - In Larry Alexander & Kimberly Kessler Ferzan (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Ethics and the Criminal Law. Springer Verlag. pp. 471-496.
Neuroprediction, Truth-Sensitivity, and the Law.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2014 - The Journal of Ethics 18 (2):123-136.
The Role of Neuroprediction and Artificial Intelligence in the Future of Criminal Procedure Support Science: A New Era in Neuroscience and Criminal Justice.Zico Junius Fernando, Rosmanila, Laily Ratna, Achmad Cholidin & Bhanu Prakash Nunna - 2023 - Yuridika 38 (3):593-620.
The non-consequentialist moral force of promises: a response to Sinnott-Armstrong.M. B. Gill - 2012 - Analysis 72 (3):506-513.
The General Public is Neutral on “Neurolaw”.Joshua Preston - 2015 - Voices in Bioethics 1.
Evolutionary psychology: Promises and perils.J. B. Grossman & J. C. Kaufman - 2001 - In Robert J. Sternberg & James C. Kaufman (eds.), The Evolution of Intelligence. Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 9--25.
Applying Confirmation Theory to the Case against Neurolaw.Anton Donchev - 2018 - Balkan Journal of Philosophy 10 (1):45-54.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
22 (#697,556)

6 months
6 (#701,066)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Political realism as ideology critique.Janosch Prinz & Enzo Rossi - 2017 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20 (3):334-348.
Shared intentions, public reason, and political autonomy.Blain Neufeld - 2019 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 49 (6):776-804.
Political realism meets civic republicanism.Philip Pettit - 2017 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20 (3):331-347.
Political realism and the realist ‘Tradition’.Alison McQueen - 2017 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20 (3):296-313.
Inferential seemings and the problem of reflective awareness.Luca Moretti - 2019 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 49 (2):253-271.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references