Abstract
The graphical presentation of experimental data in the physical sciences has several advantages which today are too familiar to require very detailed enumeration. Its greatest strength lies in the clarity and succinctness with which it displays the information contained in tabulated results: for the experimenter a graph provides a rough and immediate check on the accuracy and suitability of the methods he is using, and for the reader of a scientific report it may convey in a few seconds information that could only be gleaned from a table of measurements by hours of close study. There are occasions where only the analysis of experimental graphs will provide the information we require, but usually the actual analysis of results is carried out nowadays by computational methods. The use of graphs is therefore not so much a necessary part of scientific procedure as an extremely useful one, and one that is often taken very much for granted
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0007087400014229
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,077
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

J.H. Lambert's Work on Probability.O. B. Sheynin - 1971 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 7 (3):244-256.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Sources for a History of the Ternary Diagram.Richard J. Howarth - 1996 - British Journal for the History of Science 29 (3):337-356.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Twilight Graphs.J. C. E. Dekker - 1981 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 46 (3):539-571.
Illusory Trends in the Observations of Bar Graphs.J. L. Graham - 1937 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 20 (6):597.
Domatic Partitions of Computable Graphs.Matthew Jura, Oscar Levin & Tyler Markkanen - 2014 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 53 (1-2):137-155.
Expansions of Ultrahomogeneous Graphs.J. E. Helmreich - 1995 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 36 (3):414-424.
Some Natural Decision Problems in Automatic Graphs.Dietrich Kuske & Markus Lohrey - 2010 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 75 (2):678-710.
Small Universal Families for Graphs Omitting Cliques Without GCH.Katherine Thompson - 2010 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 49 (7-8):799-811.
Dangerous Reference Graphs and Semantic Paradoxes.Landon Rabern, Brian Rabern & Matthew Macauley - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (5):727-765.
Graphs with ∏ 1 0 (K)Y-Sections.Boško Živaljević - 1993 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 32 (4):259-273.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-01-22

Total views
7 ( #1,043,322 of 2,454,519 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,188 of 2,454,519 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes