- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Forecasting with jury-based probabilistic argumentation
Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 33 (3):224-243 (2023)
Abstract
1. The benefits resulting from a combination of quantitative (e.g. probabilistic) and qualitative (e.g. logic-based) reasoning are widely acknowledged (e.g. see Domingos et al., 2006; Poole, 2011)....Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Probabilistic abstract argumentation: an investigation with Boltzmann machines.Régis Riveret, Dimitrios Korkinof, Moez Draief & Jeremy Pitt - 2015 - Argument and Computation 6 (2):178-218.
Elementary probabilistic operations: a framework for probabilistic reasoning.Siegfried Macho & Thomas Ledermann - 2024 - Thinking and Reasoning 30 (2):259-300.
An empirical and axiomatic comparison of ranking-based semantics for abstract argumentation.Elise Bonzon, Jérôme Delobelle, Sébastien Konieczny & Nicolas Maudet - 2023 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 33 (3-4):328-386.
Towards a Rough Mereology-Based Logic for Approximate Solution Synthesis. Part 1.Jan Komorowski, Lech Polkowski & Andrzej Skowron - 1997 - Studia Logica 58 (1):143-184.
A neural cognitive model of argumentation with application to legal inference and decision making.Artur S. D'Avila Garcez, Dov M. Gabbay & Luis C. Lamb - 2014 - Journal of Applied Logic 12 (2):109-127.
Because Hitler did it! Quantitative tests of Bayesian argumentation using ad hominem.Adam J. L. Harris, Anne S. Hsu & Jens K. Madsen - 2012 - Thinking and Reasoning 18 (3):311 - 343.
Towards a rough mereology-based logic for approximate solution synthesis. Part.Jan Komorowski, Lech T. Polkowski & Andrzej Skowron - 1997 - Studia Logica 58 (1):143-184.
Bayesian argumentation and the value of logical validity.Benjamin Eva & Stephan Hartmann - 2018 - Psychological Review 125 (5):806-821.
Bayesian Confirmation or Ordinary Confirmation?Yongfeng Yuan - 2020 - Studia Logica 108 (3):425-449.
Logical relations in a statistical problem.Jon Williamson, Jan-Willem Romeijn, Rolf Haenni & Gregory Wheeler - 2008 - In Benedikt Lowe, Jan-Willem Romeijn & Eric Pacuit (eds.), Foundations of the Formal Sciences Vi: Probabilistic Reasoning and Reasoning With Probabilities. Studies in Logic. College Publications.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-08-22
Downloads
17 (#895,795)
6 months
13 (#219,507)
2023-08-22
Downloads
17 (#895,795)
6 months
13 (#219,507)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games.Phan Minh Dung - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence 77 (2):321-357.
An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning.A. Bondarenko, P. M. Dung, R. A. Kowalski & F. Toni - 1997 - Artificial Intelligence 93 (1-2):63-101.
Computing ideal sceptical argumentation.P. M. Dung, P. Mancarella & F. Toni - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence 171 (10-15):642-674.
A tutorial on assumption-based argumentation.Francesca Toni - 2014 - Argument and Computation 5 (1):89-117.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-7qn45 uwo