The justification of concepts in Carnap's aufbau

Philosophy of Science 70 (4):671-689 (2003)
Abstract
This paper concerns the recent debate on the nature and motivations of the epistemological project advanced in Rudolf Carnap's (1891-1970) Aufbau. Much of this debate has been initiated by Michael Friedman and Alan Richardson who argue (against the received view of the Aufbau as a foundationalist defense of empiricism) that Carnap's epistemological project is located in the tradition of neo-Kantian epistemology. On this revisionist reading of the Aufbau, Carnap's project is not motivated to address traditional empiricist problems regarding the justification of knowledge, but rather to show how objective knowledge is possible. A central aspect of the Aufbau that is neglected in the revisionists' analysis is the role of epistemic justification in Carnap's project. The aim of the present study is to argue that although the general epistemology in the Aufbau can be cast as neo-Kantian, Carnap's method of construction theory (or rational reconstruction) is formulated precisely as an empiricist method for the justification of conceptual knowledge. Construction theory radically redefines `empirical justification' into a formal-conventional notion, and is part of Carnap's more general agenda of redefining epistemology as a purely formal discipline.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/378859
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,840
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Carnap's Aufbau in the Weimar Context.Thomas Mormann - 2016 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 18:115-136.
Philipp Frank's Austro-American Logical Empiricism.Thomas Mormann - 2017 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 7 (1): 56 - 86.
A Reserved Reading of Carnap's Aufbau.Christopher Pincock - 2005 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (4):518–543.
Carnap's Logical Structure of the World.Christopher Pincock - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (6):951-961.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Carnap's Logical Structure of the World.Chris Pincock - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (6):951-961.
Anomalous Monism in Carnap's Aufbau.Mehdi Nasrin - 2004 - Erkenntnis 60 (3):283-293.
How Not to Russell Carnap's Aufbau.Alan Richardson - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:3-14.
Was Carnap a Complete Verificationist in the Aufbau?Richard Creath - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:384 - 393.
New Life for Carnap's "Aufbau?".Hannes Leitgeb - 2011 - Synthese 180 (2):265 - 299.
A Reserved Reading of Carnap's Aufbau.Christopher Pincock - 2005 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (4):518–543.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

387 ( #6,792 of 2,178,217 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #316,497 of 2,178,217 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums