Philosophy of Science 70 (4):671-689 (2003)

Authors
Jonathan Y. Tsou
Iowa State University
Abstract
This paper concerns the recent debate on the nature and motivations of the epistemological project advanced in Rudolf Carnap's (1891-1970) Aufbau. Much of this debate has been initiated by Michael Friedman and Alan Richardson who argue (against the received view of the Aufbau as a foundationalist defense of empiricism) that Carnap's epistemological project is located in the tradition of neo-Kantian epistemology. On this revisionist reading of the Aufbau, Carnap's project is not motivated to address traditional empiricist problems regarding the justification of knowledge, but rather to show how objective knowledge is possible. A central aspect of the Aufbau that is neglected in the revisionists' analysis is the role of epistemic justification in Carnap's project. The aim of the present study is to argue that although the general epistemology in the Aufbau can be cast as neo-Kantian, Carnap's method of construction theory (or rational reconstruction) is formulated precisely as an empiricist method for the justification of conceptual knowledge. Construction theory radically redefines `empirical justification' into a formal-conventional notion, and is part of Carnap's more general agenda of redefining epistemology as a purely formal discipline.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/378859
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,878
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Philipp Frank’s Austro-American Logical Empiricism.Thomas Mormann - 2017 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 7 (1): 56 - 86.
Carnap's Logical Structure of the World.Chris Pincock - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (6):951-961.
Carnap's Aufbau in the Weimar Context.Thomas Mormann - 2016 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 18:115-136.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Was Carnap a Complete Verificationist in the Aufbau?Richard Creath - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:384 - 393.
How Not to Russell Carnap's Aufbau.Alan Richardson - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:3-14.
Anomalous Monism in Carnap's Aufbau.Mehdi Nasrin - 2004 - Erkenntnis 60 (3):283-293.
Carnap's Logical Structure of the World.Chris Pincock - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (6):951-961.
A Reserved Reading of Carnap's Aufbau.Christopher Pincock - 2005 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (4):518–543.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
426 ( #18,453 of 2,439,004 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,051 of 2,439,004 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes