Divine deception and monotheism: A reply to Hasker: Dale Tuggy

Religious Studies 47 (1):109-115 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In two recent pieces William Hasker argues that my arguments against Social Trinitarianism fail. I argue here that he hasn't successfully refuted or rebutted them, and that his response to the quaternity problem sacrifices monotheism

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Divine deception and monotheism: a reply to Hasker.Dale Tuggy - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (1):109-115.
Deception and the Trinity: A Rejoinder to Tuggy.William Hasker - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (1):117 - 120.
Two Trinities: Reply to Hasker.Brian Leftow - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (4):441 - 447.
Two trinities: Reply to Hasker: Brian Leftow.Brian Leftow - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (4):441-447.
Can Social Trinitarianism Be Monotheist?William Hasker - 2013 - Faith and Philosophy 30 (4):439-443.
The Trinity and the New Testament – a Counter-Challenge to Dale Tuggy.William Hasker - 2021 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 13 (1):179-199.
On the rationality of positive mysterianism.James N. Anderson - 2018 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 83 (3):291-307.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
21 (#762,792)

6 months
3 (#1,046,015)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

The Logic of the Trinity.Einar Duenger Bohn - 2011 - Sophia 50 (3):363-374.
Deception and the Trinity: A Rejoinder to Tuggy.William Hasker - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (1):117 - 120.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Objections to Social Trinitarianism.William Hasker - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (4):421 - 439.

Add more references