Jus post bellum and Global Responsibility for Peace

Pro-Fil 21 (2):18 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article deals with the newly discussed set of principles that focus on various issues concerning the end of a war and the establishment of peaceful conditions for the society after a war ends. It also reveals some drawbacks of the jus post bellum principles and searches for its possible modifications into a more complex and applicable set of rules that should govern any post-war activities on both sides of the conflict. The aim is to reach its plausibility in a dynamic global society and thus argue that global peace is an attainable goal only when it becomes the goal of the global community.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.5817/pf20-2-2127

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Epistemic Implications of St. Thomas Aquinas’ Just War Theory on Global Peace.Olivia Chidera Maduabuchi, Innocent Anthony Uke & Raphael Olisa Maduabuchi - 2023 - Open Journal of Philosophy 13 (3):565-585.
Sexual Violence in Conflict Situations as Structural Injustice.Sally J. Scholz - 2022 - Washington University Review of Philosophy 2:43-61.
The state, human rights and the ethics of war termination: what should a just peace look like? A critical appraisal.Manuela Melandri - 2011 - Journal of Global Ethics 7 (3):241-249.
Restraining the fox: Minimalism in the ethics of war and peace.Lonneke Peperkamp - 2022 - Journal of International Political Theory 18 (1):110-122.
Terrorism, jus post bellum and the Prospect of Peace.Anne Schwenkenbecher - 2017 - In Florian Demont-Biaggi (ed.), The Nature of Peace and the Morality of Armed Conflict. Cham: Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 123-140.
The Blurry Boundaries Between War and Peace: Do We Need to Extend Just War Theory?Lonneke Peperkamp - 2016 - Archiv Fuer Rechts Und Sozialphilosphie 102 (3):315-332.
Jus Post Bellum and Political Reconciliation.Colleen Murphy & Linda Radzik - 2013 - In Larry May & Elizabeth Edenberg (eds.), Jus Post Bellum and Transitional Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jus post bellum: Foundational principles and a proposed model.George M. Clifford - 2012 - Journal of Military Ethics 11 (1):42-57.
Just Military Preparedness (Jus ante Bellum): A New Category of Just War Theory.Harry van der Linden - manuscript
Jus Post Bellum: A Case of Minimalism versus Maximalism?Lonneke Peperkamp - 2014 - Ethical Perspectives 21 (2):255-288.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-06

Downloads
13 (#1,065,206)

6 months
9 (#355,594)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Morality of War.Brian Orend - 2006 - Peterborough, CA: Broadview Press.
Jus Post Bellum.Gary J. Bass - 2004 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 32 (4):384-412.
Cosmopolitan Peace.Cecile Fabre - 2016 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
Skepticism about Jus Post Bellum.Seth Lazar - 2012 - In Larry May & Andrew Forcehimes (eds.), Morality, Jus Post Bellum, and International Law. Cambridge University Press. pp. 204-222.
The Jus Post Bellum.C. A. J. Coady - 2011 - In Paolo Tripodi & Jessica Wolfendale (eds.), New wars and new soldiers: military ethics in the contemporary world. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

View all 6 references / Add more references