Argumentation 15 (4):457-470 (2001)

Abstract
In this article, the pragma-dialectical model of a critical discussion is demonstrated to provide a useful instrument for discovering causes of an unsatisfactory development of problem-solving discussions. First a sketch is given of the development of a problem-solving discussion which, in the opinion of the participants themselves, developed in an unsatisfactory fashion. Then it is argued that this development can be traced back to flaws in the execution of the stages of a critical discussion
Keywords Critical discussion  problem-solving discussion  verbal interaction
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1012023601906
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,694
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Pragma-Dialectics and Beyond.Daniel Bonevac - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (4):451-459.
The Logic of Critique.Hengameh Irandoust - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (2):133-148.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Problem-Solving, Research Traditions, and the Development of Scientific Fields.Henry Frankel - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:29 - 40.
Critical Thinking and Asynchronous Discussion.John Miller - 1999 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 19 (1):18-27.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-11

Total views
17 ( #603,266 of 2,438,584 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #436,491 of 2,438,584 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes