Zeno's paradoxes and the tile argument

Philosophy of Science 54 (2):295-302 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A solution of the zeno paradoxes in terms of a discrete space is usually rejected on the basis of an argument formulated by hermann weyl, The so-Called tile argument. This note shows that, Given a set of reasonable assumptions for a discrete geometry, The weyl argument does not apply. The crucial step is to stress the importance of the nonzero width of a line. The pythagorean theorem is shown to hold for arbitrary right triangles

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
98 (#56,161)

6 months
16 (#899,032)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jean Paul Van Bendegem
Vrije Universiteit Brussel

References found in this work

On Discrete Spaces.Ben Rogers - 1968 - American Philosophical Quarterly 5 (2):117--123.

Add more references