Concepts of process in social science explanations

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21 (3):318-331 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Social scientists using one or another concept of process have paid little attention to underlying issues of methodology and explanation. Commonly, the concept used is a loose one. When it is not, there often are other problems, such as errors of reification and of assuming that events sometimes connected in a sequence are invariably thus connected. While it may be useful to retain the term " process" for some sequences of intelligibly connected actions and events, causal explanation must be sought with respect to the events constituting processes rather than with respect to processes regarded as unitary entities.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Probabilistic Causal Processes.Jonathan Richard Katz - 1983 - Dissertation, The University of British Columbia (Canada)
Action and Agent.Kurt Baier - 1965 - The Monist 49 (2):183-195.
Nomic necessity and empiricism.John F. Halpin - 1999 - Noûs 33 (4):630-643.
An interpretation of the theory of gestalt.Frederick V. Smith - 1941 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 19 (3):193-215.
The dead donor rule: Lessons from linguistics.D. Alan Shewmon - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (3):277-300.
Research procedure and laws of culture.Alexander Lesser - 1939 - Philosophy of Science 6 (3):345-355.
The process of inference.Christopher Mole - 2018 - In Rowland Stout (ed.), Process, Action, and Experience. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 149-167.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
39 (#115,291)

6 months
9 (#1,260,759)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew P. Vayda
Rutgers University, New Brunswick

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Scientific Image.William Demopoulos & Bas C. van Fraassen - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (4):603.
The poverty of historicism.Karl Raimund Popper - 1960 - London,: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Sour grapes: studies in the subversion of rationality.Jon Elster - 1983 - Paris: Editions de la Maison des sciences de l'homme.
Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality.Jon Elster - 1983 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 17 references / Add more references