In Andy Egan & Brian Weatherson (eds.), Epistemic Modality. Oxford University Press (2009)
The simplest story about modals—might, must, possibly, necessary, have to, can, ought to, presumably, likelier, and the rest—is also the canon: modals are context-dependent quantiﬁers over a domain of possibilities. Diﬀerent ﬂavors of modality correspond to quantiﬁcation over diﬀerent domains of possibilities. Logical modalities quantify over all the possibilities there are, physical modalities over possibilities compatible with the..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Scope and Situation Binding in LTAG Using Semantic Unification.Maribel Romero & Laura Kallmeyer - manuscript
A Flexible Contextualist Account of Epistemic Modals.Janice Dowell, J. L. - 2011 - Philosophers' Imprint 11 (14):1-25.
On Imagining What is True (and What is False).Patricia Barres & P. N. Johnson-Laird - 2003 - Thinking and Reasoning 9 (1):1 – 42.
Actualist Essentialism and General Possibilities.Ori Simchen - 2006 - Journal of Philosophy 103 (1):5-26.
On Truth-Conditions for If (but Not Quite Only If ).Anthony S. Gillies - 2009 - Philosophical Review 118 (3):325-349.
The Pragmatics of Insensitive Assessments: Understanding The Relativity of Assessments of Judgments of Personal Taste, Epistemic Modals, and More.Gunnar Björnsson & Alexander Almér - 2010 - In Barbara H. Partee, Michael Glanzberg & Jurģis Šķilters (eds.), The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication. pp. 1-45.
Added to index2010-10-25
Total downloads65 ( #76,949 of 2,146,306 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #107,004 of 2,146,306 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.