Pulling the heartstrings, arguing the case: a narrative response to the issue of moral agency in moral distress

Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (12):746-749 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper it is argued that moral distress is an emotional response to an ethical dilemma, and that to date, the literature has largely failed to address the fundamental questions that need to be answered in response to this emotional response. Firstly, does moral distress accurately identify a wrong being done to patients? Secondly, if it does, can nurses carry out this ‘wrong doing’, but not be responsible for the consequences of their actions? A narrative that reflects the emotional nature of moral distress is presented, with the aim of providing some answers to these questions

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
27 (#577,964)

6 months
4 (#1,006,062)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Not passion's slave: emotions and choice.Robert C. Solomon - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy.Paul B. Woodruff - 1989 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50 (1):205-210.
Compassion and Beyond.Roger Crisp - 2008 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (3):233-246.
Tragic-remorse–the anguish of dirty hands.Stephen De Wijze - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (5):453-471.
Risk and luck in medical ethics.Donna Dickenson - 2003 - Cambridge, UK: Polity.

View all 9 references / Add more references