A Chinese perspective on the concept of common morality by Beauchamp and Childress

Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 27 (4):132-134 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

T.L. Beauchamp and J.F. Childress are American bioethicists. They formulated four clusters of principles of biomedical ethics in their book, “The Principles of Biomedical Ethics.” They are the Principle of Respect for Autonomy, the Principle of Non-Maleficence, the Principle of Beneficence, and the Principle of Justice. Beauchamp and Childress also developed their theory of common morality as the source of considered judgments for the principles and the method of bioethics. These principles and common morality are used internationally and successfully. This book has been revised to the seventh edition to allow for improvements. The principles are being used in China, but the understanding of common morality is not enough. This paper studies the implications of common morality. This work is useful for the development of Chinese bioethics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Not just autonomy--the principles of American biomedical ethics.S. Holm - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (6):332-338.
Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th edn.S. Holm - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (5):332-2.
Authority of the Common Morality.Griffin Trotter - 2020 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 45 (4-5):427-440.
Forty Years of the Four Principles: Enduring Themes from Beauchamp and Childress.Matthew Shea - 2020 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 45 (4-5):387-395.
What is the Common Morality, Really?Benjamin Bautz - 2016 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 26 (1):29-45.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-07

Downloads
1 (#1,722,932)

6 months
2 (#1,816,284)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references