Authors |
|
Abstract |
The well-known empiricist apories of the lawfulness of nature prevent an adequate philosophical interpretation of empirical science until this day. Clarification can only be expected through an immanent refutation of the empiricist point of view. My argument is that Hume’s claim, paradigmatic for modern empiricism, is not just inconsequent, but simply contradictory: Empiricism denies that a lawlike character of nature can be substantiated. But, as is shown, anyone who claimes experience to be the basis of knowledge (as the empiricist naturally does), has, in fact, always already presupposed the lawfullness of nature, i.e. has assumed the ontology of a nature lawful in itself. If lawfulness is, more closely, understood as dependency on conditions, then the functional character of the laws of nature is involved with the consequence that verification is not to be taken as a mere repetition of measurements but as clarification of the conditional structure of the physical process. Furthermore the functionality of the laws of nature also includes a statement on their invariance (relative to certain transformations) and so their lawlikeness. This throws a new light on the problem of induction. Seen in this way it is hardly surprising that the notorious neglect of the functional aspect in empiricism has led to fundamental problems with the concept of the law of nature.
|
Keywords | critics of empirism, Hume, self-defeating arguments, lawfulness of nature, functional dependance on conditions |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1007/BF01801120 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Nomological and Transcendental Criteria for Scientific Laws.Predrag Šustar - 2005 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (3):533-544.
Positivismusstreit: Die Auseinandersetzungen der Frankfurter Schule MIT Dem Logischen Positivismus, Dem Amerikanischen Pragmatismus Und Dem Kritischen Rationalisinus.Xabier Eizagirre - 1997 - Theoria 12 (1):197-199.
Hans-Joachim Dahms, Positivismusstreit, Die Auseinandersetzung der Frankfurter Schule MIT Dem Logischen Positivismus, Dem Amerikanischen Pragmatismus Und Dem Kritischen Rationalismus.Thomas Mormann - 1997 - Erkenntnis 46 (3):393-396.
Are Laws of Nature and Scientific Theories Peculiar in Chemistry? Scrutinizing Mendeleev's Discovery.R. Vihalemm - 2003 - Foundations of Chemistry 5 (1):7-22.
Between Authority and Interpretation: On the Theory of Law and Practical Reason.Joseph Raz (ed.) - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Zur Eliminierung des Gödelschen Unvollständigkeitsproblems im Zusammenhang mit dem Antinomienproblem.Dieter Wandschneider - 1975 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 6 (1):65-81.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
218 ( #51,143 of 2,498,260 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #31,264 of 2,498,260 )
2009-01-28
Total views
218 ( #51,143 of 2,498,260 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #31,264 of 2,498,260 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads