Naturalism

Think 19 (56):85-88 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

My argument is that naturalism is too restricted and dogmatic an account of the many different sorts of entities and explanations that we employ in trying to understand our world. It is a faith rather than a mode of inquiry.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,070

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Naturalism and theism.John C. Lennox - 2020 - Think 19 (56):89-101.
Naturalism.Graham Oppy - 2020 - Think 19 (56):7-20.
Naturalism and the scientific method.Michael Ruse - 2013 - In Stephen Bullivant & Michael Ruse (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Atheism. Oxford University Press UK. pp. 383.
Naturalism.Charles Pigden - 1991 - In Peter Singer (ed.), A Companion to Ethics. Cambridge, Mass., USA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 421-431.
The naturalism of the sciences.Gregory W. Dawes & Tiddy Smith - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 67:22-31.
Naturalism.Eric Steinhart - 2019 - In Graham Oppy (ed.), A Companion to Atheism and Philosophy. Hoboken: Blackwell. pp. 152-66.
Naturalism and Non‐Naturalism.Jonathan Jacobs - 2002 - In Jonathan A. Jacobs (ed.), Dimensions of Moral Theory: An Introduction to Metaethics and Moral Psychology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 110–152.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-10-07

Downloads
9 (#1,271,099)

6 months
2 (#1,449,525)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references