To treat or not to treat: the legal, ethical and therapeutic implications of treatment refusal

Journal of Medical Ethics 17 (3):131-135 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Health professionals faced with refusal of life-saving treatment may wish to override a person's wishes, especially if that person suffers from a mental disorder. Mental illness does not automatically mean a patient is incapable of making decisions of this nature. It is not always clear whether an individual is legally competent to decide whether to undergo treatment or not. This article discusses a clinical example and analyses some of the moral implications

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Health professionals have an ethical duty . .A. Williams - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (2):85-88.
How to justify enforcing a Ulysses contract when Ulysses is competent to refuse.John K. Davis - 2008 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (1):pp. 87-106.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
77 (#211,173)

6 months
13 (#276,041)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Patient autonomy in emergency medicine.Anne-Cathrine Naess, Reidun Foerde & Petter Andreas Steen - 2001 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (1):71-77.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making.Allen E. Buchanan & Dan W. Brock - 1989 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Dan W. Brock.

Add more references