European Journal for Philosophy of Science 1 (2):147-172 (2011)
The focus of this study is cognitive choice: the selection of one cognitive option (a hypothesis, a theory, or an axiom, for instance) rather than another. The study proposes that cognitive choice should be based on the plausibilities of states posited by rival cognitive options and the utilities of these options' information outcomes. The proposal introduces a form of decision theory that is novel because comparative; it permits many choices among cognitive options to be based on merely comparative plausibilities and utilities. This form of decision theory intersects with recommendations by advocates of decision theory for cognitive choice, on the one hand, and defenders of comparative evaluation of scientific hypotheses and theories, on the other. But it differs from prior decision-theoretic proposals because it requires no more than minimal precision in specifying plausibilities and utilities. And it differs from comparative proposals because none has shown how comparative evaluations can be carried out within a decision-theoretic framework.
|Keywords||Decision theory Cognitive choice Probability Plausibility Utility Information|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Science and Values: The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate.Larry Laudan - 1984 - University of California Press.
Citations of this work BETA
New Tools for Theory Choice and Theory Diagosis.John R. Welch - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (3):318-329.
New Tools for Theory Choice and Theory Diagnosis.John R. Welch - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (3):318-329.
Similar books and articles
Real-Life Decisions and Decision Theory.John R. Welch - 2012 - In Sabine Roeser, Rafaela Hillerbrand, Per Sandin & Martin Peterson (eds.), Handbook of Risk Theory. Springer.
Emotional Decisions.Allison Barnes & Paul Thagard - 1996 - In Garrison W. Cottrell (ed.), Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 426--429.
Prospect Relativity: How Choice Options Influence Decision Under Risk.Neil Stewart, Nick Chater, Henry P. Stott & Stian Reimers - 2003 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132 (1):23.
Decision Theory, Philosophical Perspectives.Darren Bradley - 2013 - In Hal Pashler (ed.), Encyclopedia of the Mind. Sage Publications.
On the Significance of Choice Sets with Incompatibilities.Vivian Charles Walsh - 1967 - Philosophy of Science 34 (3):243-250.
The Logical Foundations of Decision-Theoretic Planning in Autonomous Agents.John Pollock - manuscript
Cogniton, Rationality and Decision.José Gaxiola - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 33:67-73.
Constraints and the Measurement of Freedom of Choice.Sebastiano Bavetta & Marco Del Seta - 2001 - Theory and Decision 50 (3):213-238.
Decision Making and Business Ethics: The Implications of Using Image Theory in Preference to Rational Choice. [REVIEW]Kevin Morrell - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 50 (3):239-252.
Acceptance of Empirical Statements: A Bayesian Theory Without Cognitive Utilities.John C. Harsanyi - 1985 - Theory and Decision 18 (1):1-30.
Symposium on ''Cognition and Rationality: Part I'' Relationships Between Rational Decisions, Human Motives, and Emotions. [REVIEW]Cristiano Castelfranchi, Francesca Giardini & Francesca Marzo - 2006 - Mind and Society 5 (2):173-197.
Decisions in Dynamic Settings.Paul Weirich - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:438 - 449.
The Effect of Context Variables on Cognitive Effort in Multiattribute Binary Choice.S. Iglesias-Parro, E. I. de La Fuente & A. R. Ortega - 2002 - Theory and Decision 52 (2):101-125.
Added to index2010-12-06
Total downloads48 ( #107,283 of 2,158,407 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #64,994 of 2,158,407 )
How can I increase my downloads?