Jennifer Welchman
University of Alberta
: William James's "The Will to Believe" has been criticized for offering untenable arguments in support of belief in unvalidated hypotheses. Although James is no longer accused of suggesting we can create belief ex nihilo, critics continue to charge that James's defense of belief in what he called the "religious hypothesis" confuses belief with hypothesis adoption and endorses willful persistence in unvalidated beliefs—not, as he claimed, in pursuit of truth, but merely to avoid the emotional stress of abandoning them. I argue that James's position in "The Will to Believe" can be defended provided we give up thinking of it as ethics of belief and think of it instead as an ethics of self-experimentation. Subjective data are relevant to rational consent to participation in research
Keywords William James  American philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2979/TRA.2006.42.2.229
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,821
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Nature of Belief: The Proper Context for James' "The Will to Believe".Patrick K. Dooley - 1972 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 8 (3):141 - 151.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
133 ( #75,373 of 2,425,831 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #350,836 of 2,425,831 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes