Philosophy of Science 40 (4):518-537 (1973)
AbstractMany philosophers have asserted that evolutionary theory is unfalsifiable. In this paper I refute these assertions by detailing some falsifiable predictions of the theory and the evidence used to test them. I then analyze both these predictions and evidence cited to support assertions of unfalsifiability in order to show both what type of predictions are possible and why it has been so difficult to spot them. The conclusion is that the apparent logical peculiarity of evolutionary theory is not a property of evolutionary theory; it is a property of our human-sized perspective on evolutionary theory
Similar books and articles
Language and asymmetry versus the social brain – where are the testable predictions?T. J. Crow - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):857-858.
Extending the behavioral sciences framework: Clarification of methods, predictions, and concepts.Alex Mesoudi & Kevin N. Laland - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):36-37.
Prediction in selectionist evolutionary theory.Rasmus Gr⊘Nfeldt Winther - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (5):889-901.
Evolution of human jealousy a just-so story or a just-so criticism?Neven Sesardic - 2003 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (4):427-443.
Comparative, continuity, and computational evidence in evolutionary theory: Predictive evidence versus productive evidence.David M. W. Powers - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (3):294-296.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The propensity interpretation of fitness.Susan K. Mills & John H. Beatty - 1979 - Philosophy of Science 46 (2):263-286.
Adaptation and Evolutionary Theory.Robert N. Brandon - 1978 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 9 (3):181.
Pure science and the problem of progress.Heather Douglas - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 46:55-63.