Moving Clinical Deliberations on Administrative Discharge in Drug Addiction Treatment Beyond Moral Rhetoric to Empirical Ethics

Journal of Clinical Ethics 27 (1):71-75 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Patients’ admission to modern substance use disorder treatment comes with the attendant risk of being discharged from treatment— a widespread practice. This article describes the three mainstream theories of addiction that operate as a reference point for clinicians in reasoning about a decision to discharge a patient from treatment. The extant literature is reviewed to highlight the pathways that patients follow after administrative discharge. Little scientific research has been done to investigate claims and hypotheses about the therapeutic function of AD, which points to the need for empirical ethics to inform clinical addictions practice.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Do We Mean When We Call Someone a Drug Addict?Janet Jones - 2020 - Health Care Analysis 28 (4):391-403.
Practices of Government in Methadone Maintenance.Esben Houborg Pedersen - 2002 - Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 4 (2):61-69.
Drug Laws, Ethics, and History.Adam Greif - 2019 - Filozofia 74 (2):95 - 110.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-14

Downloads
12 (#1,075,977)

6 months
9 (#299,476)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references