Philosophy of science after Mirowski’s history of the philosophy of science

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (4):779-789 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article critical examines Mirowski's recent article in SHPS. I argue that his externalist history of the philosophy of science is unacceptable to philosophers' own understanding of their field and practice.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.08.016

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reichenbach’s Disease and Mirowski’s Theory of Knowledge? Or, Will to Power as Philosophy of Science.Alan Richardson - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (4):744-753.
Whither philosophy of science?Helen E. Longino - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (4):774-778.
K. Brad Wray: Interpreting Kuhn: Critical Essays. [REVIEW]Howard Sankey - 2022 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 12 (1):311-314.
Kuhn’s evolutionary social epistemology. [REVIEW]Michael Bycroft - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (3):425-429.
Response to the critique by Dr. K. Brad Wray, published in foundations of chemistry October 6, 2022.Gareth R. Eaton - 2023 - Foundations of Chemistry 25 (3):457-461.
What’s in It for the Historian of Science? Reflections on the Value of Philosophy of Science for History of Science.Theodore Arabatzis - 2017 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 31 (1):69-82.
Resisting Scientific Realism by K. Brad Wray. [REVIEW]Samuel Ruhmkorff - 2019 - British Journal for Philosophy of Science Review of Books 1.
History and philosophy of science after the practice-turn: From inherent tension to local integration.Max Dresow - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 82:57-65.
K. Brad Wray: Resisting Scientific Realism, Book Review. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 2018. [REVIEW]Ragnar van der Merwe - 2020 - Journal for the General Philosophy of Science 51 (4):637-641.
The tribunal of philosophy and its norms: History and philosophy in Georges Canguilhem's historical epistemology.C. Chimisso - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34 (2):297-327.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
7 (#1,407,052)

6 months
7 (#592,073)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The epistemic significance of collaborative research.K. Brad Wray - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (1):150-168.
History of the Royal Society.Thomas Sprat, Jackson I. Copc & Harold Whitmore Jones - 1960 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 11 (43):263-264.
Political philosophy of science in logical empiricism: the left Vienna Circle.Thomas Uebel - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (4):754-773.

Add more references