Philosophy of Science 59 (3):480-86 (1992)

Authors
Abstract
This discussion takes up an attack by Jerrold Aronson (seconded by Rom Harre) on the use made by Norwood R. Hanson of the Gestalt-Switch Analogy in the philosophy of science. Aronson's understanding of what is implied in a gestalt switch is shown to be flawed. In his endeavor to detach conceptual understanding from perceptual identification he cites several examples, without realizing the degree to which such gestalt switches can affect conceptualizing or how conceptualizing can affect gestalts. In particular, he has not confronted the possibility of such gestalt selection being involved in the basic identification of what we term "entities"
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/289685
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,177
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophical investigations.Ludwig Wittgenstein & G. E. M. Anscombe - 1953 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 161:124-124.
On Singling Out an Object Determinately.David Wiggins - 1986 - In P. Pettit & J. McDowell (eds.), Subject, Thought and Context. Clarendon Press.
New Representationalism.Edmond Wright - 1990 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20 (1):65-92.
The Entity Fallacy in Epistemology.Edmond Wright - 1992 - Philosophy 67 (259):33 - 50.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
41 ( #274,615 of 2,499,680 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,206 of 2,499,680 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes