The Influence of Media Cue Multiplicity on Deceivers and Those Who Are Deceived

Journal of Business Ethics 106 (3):337-352 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We extend prior research of deceitful behavior by studying the reactions of those who are targets of deception and how a specific attribute of communication media, cue multiplicity , influences such reactions. We report on a laboratory experiment involving dyads asked to engage in a stock share purchase exercise. We find that when a broker is perceived to act deceitfully by the buyer, the buyer reacts with negative affect (anger) which provokes subsequent acts of revenge against the broker. Importantly, we find that media with higher cue multiplicity attenuate buyer anger as well as lessen the propensity for the buyer to seek retaliatory acts of revenge. We further find that moral anger mediates the effect of buyers’ perceived deception on revenge

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Do the self-deceived get what they want?Eric Funkhouser - 2005 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (3):295-312.
Multiplicity, Complexity, and the Necessity of Limits.Ronald C. Arnett - 2011 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 26 (2):176 - 178.
Hegel and the problem of multiplicity.Andrew Haas - 2000 - Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.
The place of the media in popular democracy.Richard D. Anderson - 1998 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 12 (4):481-500.
Media ethics on a higher order of magnitude.Clifford G. Christians - 2008 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 23 (1):3 – 14.
An informal agenda for media ethicists.Jay Black - 2008 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 23 (1):28 – 35.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-09-01

Downloads
80 (#201,278)

6 months
9 (#242,802)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?